Muhammad  Ali Khan  Khan-i-Saman
Source Maathir-Ul-Umara, Biography of the Persian and Hindu Officers of the Rulers of Inda From 1500 to 1780 A.D.
By Nawa Samsam-ud-Daula Shah Nawaz Khan and his son Abdul Hayy, Translated by H Beveridge
Pages
111 & 112:

MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN KHAN-I-SAMAN[1] (Vol. III, pp. 625-627)

He was the son of Taqarrab Khan Hakim Da'ud[2]. He was born in Persia. His father, who was an exceptionally clever physician, long served Shah Jahan, and received royal favours as a reward for his skill and was raised to the dignity of an Amir. Muhammad Ali also was granted the rank of 1,000. After Aurangzib's accession when the victorious army returned to the Capital from the Panjab, Muhammad Ali was granted the title of Khan. As Taqarrab Khan had for treatment been kept in attendance on the King (Sha Jahan), who had been deprived of the sovereignty, Aurengzib for some reason became displeased[3] with him, and censured him. The son also, in view of his following his father, was deprived of his rank and fell out of royal favour. When in the 5th year the father died a natural death, the son was awarded a robe of honour as in instance of his restoration to royal favour, and granted the rank of  1,500 with 200 horse. In the 17th year on the death of Hakim Salih Khan he was appointed Superintendent of the Furriery[4] (Kar Karaqkhana), and his rank was increased to 2,000 with 1,000 horse, Later he was made Superintendent of the China-ware department (Chini Khana).


As he had been found trustworthy, careful, capable and skilful, he was, before the march to Ajmer appointed to the high office of Khan-i-Saman in succession to Ruh Ullah Khan. His good qualities, such as his integrity, truthfulness, righteous counsels and piety, gained him a place in the King's heart, and he became the most trusted of his compeers, and he became an object of envy even to the Amirs. At the time of the siege of Golconda, before it fell, he died[5] on 18th Rajab 1098 A.H. (10th May, 1687 A.D.). He was distinguished for his skill in physiognomy, wisdom, magnanimity[6] and high-minded-ness. He was scrupulously honest, and exercised great care in looking after the royal property. He was very affable, and whoever approached him was gratified. He was also very pious and very abstinent. He spent his days in prayer and fasting. He was always reciting chapters of the Qur'an. Ni'mat Khan, the satirist (Haft) jestingly designated him as a dry ascetic and a hypocritical devout. Presumably when Muhammad Ali held the superintendencies in connection with the post of the Khan-i-Saman, he kept Ni'mat Khan at a distance, and that is why the latter has relieved his mind about him. Muhammad Ali used to wear a large turban like those of the Qadis, and Ni'mat Khan referring to it savs:


Verse

You may have plenty of grandeur in your head,
We, however, see nothing but a turban.
 


[1] He was the Khan-i-Saman of Aurangzib from ? 1678—May 1687. See Sir Jahanshah Sarkar, History of Aurangzib, III, p. 71.
[2] Maathir-ul-Umara, I, pp. 490-493 and Yazdani's edition of 'Amal-i-Salih Ill, pp. 395, 396.
[3] See Maathir-ul-Umara, I, p. 493. In Maathir-i-Alamgi, p. 42, it is stated that Muhammad Ali Khan, the son of Hakim Da'ud, who had been deprived owing to the Emperor being annoyed with his father, was restored to favour, and was granted a mourning Khil'at and the rank of 1,500 with 200
[4] These appointments are mentioned in Maathir-i-'Alamgm, pp. 131, 165.
[5] Op. cit., p. 297.
[6] Buzurgi in the Text, which may also mean saintliness

 


Additional notes:

He was given the title of Khan in Aurengzeb's 42 year or 1660 (Alamgir-Nameh Mohammad Kazim Ibn-i-Mohammad Page 232), and return to favour: Alamgir-Nameh Page 757


The English had a vested interest in denying the Persian nature of what is called the Mughal rule in India (Turco-Persian). The customs and titles mentioned here were all Persian. Take footnote for instance, the work Khil'at is really Khetat
خلعت which in Persian Court custom was a reward of fine clothing by the Shah.